Petty propaganda a threat to anti-board campaign

The Everton board of directors have dominated the Twittersphere during the summer break and with feelings running high the owners of our great club are unlikely to be let off the hook anytime soon. This article isn’t however going to focus on the rights or wrongs of the current board (that is to come in subsequent articles during the next few weeks), instead I am commenting on the campaign to remove the board and the approach many on the fringes of the movement appear to be taking.

20 is plenty

To start with I would like to firmly state that I do not have an issue with groups of like-minded Evertonians using their right to protest against the actions of the board. The Blue Union and other prominent fan groups, including the website SOS, are hosting a meeting this weekend to discuss their plans to ramp up the pressure on the board and, as is their right, they will continue to voice their opinions loud and proudly on the internet. Whether you agree with the views of the Blue Union (and I for the most part do not) you have to applaud the fact that they are willing to do something about the current status quo, using their growing unhappiness to mount a campaign against Kenwright, Elstone and Co.

It is however, those on the fringe of this movement which I believe drives many against the anti-board campaign and creates such a significant divide amongst Evertonians. I am talking about those who are quick to jump on the slightest negative news story to spin and manipulate opinion.

Let’s firstly take the potential transfers of Angelo Ogbonna to West Ham United, Georginio Wijnaldum to Newcastle United and Xherdan Shaqiri to Stoke City. If you were to believe the propaganda machine on Twitter, Everton have, due to the failings of the board missed out on the signing of all three players.

Ogbonna is a player Everton and Martinez have a confirmed interest in, however the player has decided he would rather live in London and with the promise of regular first team football at West Ham, something he was never likely to get at Everton, he has made what would appear to be the obvious decision. This is in no way a reflection on the ambition of the Everton board.

Wijnaldum and Shaqiri, although boasting significant potential, are by no means risk free signings. Martinez has already confirmed to supporters in attendance at the U21 fixture against Burscough that he does not have a genuine interest in Wijnaldum and instead will focus on other targets in his pursuit of a new number 10. Again, if Martinez is not interested in signing players, how can it be the fault of the board that Everton have not pursued the transfer of these two maverick footballers.


Moving from ‘failed transfers’ to ground issues, a picture that has received several retweets shows a pretty dilapidated looking Goodison Park. Stained cladding and miss-painted pillars certainly don’t make pretty viewing, however this is an isolated picture (taken before any summer maintenance work has taken place) and used to highlight the grounds worst features. I cannot get on board with any campaign to tarnish Goodison Park, a ground that for me will always be the home of football.

If a campaign to oust the board is to gain genuine momentum and spread beyond the vocal few, then those at the centre of the protest need to avoid these petty arguments and stick to the big issues of which there are many.


One thought on “Petty propaganda a threat to anti-board campaign

  1. Excellent article. I agree that complaining we haven’t signed someone we had no intention of signing in the first place, is not exactly helpful. And the reality about the back up CB situation, is that whoever signs, has to be content on the bench unless first choices Jags and Stones get injured, hence names being mentioned are the Vidic’s of this world whose best days may have passed them by.
    Personally, the aspect that worries me about the anti-Board lobby, is that no alternative is being spelt out. If ‘BK et al’ sell up, who is going to be the Buyer, and who is going to input several £££s over and above what our P&L suggests is affordable (even if allowed, which it isn’t, under Financial Fair Play) for a famous club that just doesn’t have the Brand reach to match the passion of those that support the famous Blues? The reality that we need to get used to, without a benefactor, is that we’ll rely on selling on top talent like Lukaku or Barkley (and watch the fume then!) to be able to buy 2/3 more reasonably priced players. I don’t expect that to happen this season, so we’ll be buying a few with what loose change we can muster from down the back of the sofa, plus bringing through kids like Browning and Galloway. Judging by his eulogy after the Swindon game, RM is probably thinking the same about McAleny. Some of the anti Board lobby accuse the Board of financial mismanagement, which in effect accuses them of fraud, and I just don’t see that at all. They couldn’t get away with it.

What do you think? Why not post a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s