Three talking points from the Chelsea match

Everton left Stamford Bridge empty handed and although the late defeat left a bitter taste in the mouth, the recent upturn in grit and determination provides Evertonians with hope for the remainder of the season. Here we look at three talking points from last nights match.


1. The re-introduction of John Stones into the Everton defence has seen a significant improvement in the Blues resilience at the back, with Willian’s late winner only the second goal conceded in five Premier League matches since the young England centre back returned to the team. Stones oozes class and his tackle on Willian, just inside the box, early in the second half of the match was outstanding.

2. Tim Howard has been derided in recent weeks, particularly given the form of Joel. The American stopper had a strong performance between the posts for 89 minutes but should have done more to prevent Chelsea’s goal. Yes the drive from the Brazilian took a deflection on its way through, but Howard made little or no effort to get to the shot and a more agile keeper would have thrown a leg at the ball to deflect it wide for a corner kick.

3. Slightly more controversially and sure to divide opinion, but I thought Gareth Barry had a good game last night, particularly in the second half when he was reunited with James McCarthy in the Everton midfield. On a night when Everton struggled to keep the ball for long periods of play, Barry completed 51 or his 58 passes, more than any other player in white and purple. He also recovered the ball on 8 occasions, made 5 out of 6 tackles successfully and intercepted Chelsea attacks on 5 occasions. All team leading stats. Due to the late red card, Barry will be missing from the next match at home to Leicester (must win fixture) and Evertonians will get to see the partnership of McCarthy and Besic in action, but it is certainly to early to be writing off Gareth Barry.



2 thoughts on “Three talking points from the Chelsea match

  1. Barry? Seriously? Thought he was awful, too slow, got caught out too often and should have maintained his discipline in the final few minutes

    1. Don’t agree, but your view and my view don’t have to align!! But nevertheless, the tone of last night’s anti-Barry seemed to blame him for the defeat which in my view would be a tad unfair

What do you think? Why not post a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s